A new web of life
They may make you cringe in horror, or they may intrigue you. Some even have them as pets.
Regardless of how you judge them, spiders are a plentiful and widespread group of animals. They have been around for 400 million years, count 45 000 species, and crawl around on nearly every terrestrial habitat in in the world.
For long, researchers have tried to unlock the secrets to their evolutionary history, striking diversity and success.
First of its kind
One team, including Dimitar Dimitrov from the Natural History Museum in Oslo, has taken this task to an unrivalled level, sampling 932 spider species from across the globe, representing every but one of the world’s 116 known families.
The spiders of the last family are extremely small, and involving them was too complicated. But they are not really significant in this context, Dimitrov says. They will be included in further analyses.
The spiders were sequenced for several gene markers and then compared to each other, analyses in which Dimitrov was heavily involved. Simply put, the more similar the genetic code is between two species, the more closely they are related.
The team was thereby able to order and place the different spider branches in relation to each other, reconstructing their history through a so-called phylogenetic tree (see fact box).
– It is the most comprehensive study of spiders’ evolution until now, says Dimitrov.
Drivers of diversification
tree of life
- Analogy often used to depict the diversity of life (leaves and twigs) and their evolutionary history and relationships (branches and stems).
- Phylogeny is the study of evolutionary history and relationship among living organisms.
- The results of such studies are often summarized in so-called phylogenetic trees to illustrate the evolutionary relationships.
One of the main challenges for understanding spider evolution is the identification of the drivers that have led to spider diversity.
– Our findings are important for understanding how different characters such as webs, vision or venoms have evolved and have affected the diversification of different groups that have these characters.
– For example why do some families have thousands of species and others just a few?
– Now that we have a large-scale phylogeny we may actually address this question combining information on traits and natural history with the tree, the entomologist explains.
Far reaching applications
The newly spun web of life not only alters our understanding of spiders, but may also impact disciplines such as material science and medicine, the researchers claim.
– Spiders’ venoms are exceptionally diverse in terms of their components. Thus, having a large tree of spiders will help us understand how those have evolved.
– We can also use the tree to predict the venom type of spiders that have not been studied. This is also important for medical applications as some of the venom components are used in the pharmaceutical industry.
Another alluring prospect relates to the manufacture of artificial silk, which material scientists try to copy with the same extreme strength and elasticity as silk produced by spiders.
– As of now there is no artificial fiber that can match the spider silk properties.
In the future, Dimitrov explains, the research team may supply the current tree with even more species and genomic data, which may further resolve uncertain parts of the tree.
Big picture science
– What I like most about this type of studies is that they provide you with the “big picture”, a perspective that is hard to gain otherwise. Yet it is necessary to put more specific studies into a general evolutionary context, Dimitrov explains.
– For example, it is really hard to gain a deep understanding on the evolution of traits if one is looking at a specific trait in just a few species.
Envision two separate species. Both of them only thrive in a harsh and arid environment and happen to look alike. Did they adapt to the arid habitat independently or did they inherit this ability through a common ancestor?
– The two options would imply rather radical differences in our understanding of adaptations to arid environments. If it happened independently, one would suggest that this might be common, while the other would suggest it is as a rate event.
- If we lack a phylogenetic perspective we cannot really tell which one would be the case.
Postdoctoral Fellow in entomology Dimitar Dimitrov, Natural History Museum (Oslo).
More in English on Titan.uio.no:
FNs klimapanel peker på tre teknologier som kan bidra til å løse de globale klimaproblemene. – Her i Norge driver vi med «cherrypicking», sier kjernefysiker Sunniva Rose. – Det skal liksom ikke snakkes om kjernekraft. Hun gjør det likevel.