Bacteria could detect leaks at carbon capture sites
Bacteria and archaea could be used to monitor stored carbon dioxide (CO2) and convert it into useful products, such as ethanol and acetate, say researchers at the Scottish Association for Marine Science (SAMS) and the University of Oslo.
In an Opinion published October 3, in Trends in Biotechnology, they discuss how new bioinformatics tools would enable researchers to read shifts in microbial community genetics—making it possible to, for example, detect potential CO2 leaks—and how such analyses could contribute to making large-scale capture and storage of CO2 feasible.
Rising CO2 levels contribute to both global warming and ocean acidification. Capturing this CO2 from large point sources and storing it in underground geological formations, a process called carbon capture and storage (CCS), is considered one promising way to keep it out of the atmosphere and reduce its effects. The CO2 is buried in porous and permeable rock that is blanketed with at least one layer of impermeable rock.
Comes with risks
But this potential solution comes with risks, says Natalie Hicks (@DrNatalieHicks), a biogeochemist at SAMS, “one of the biggest concerns with carbon capture storage is the environmental impacts if there is a leak, …how would we know about it, how would we detect it, and what would the environmental implications be.”
Hicks and her co-authors, who include Kjetill S. Jakobsen and Unni Vik from the University of Oslo in a multidisciplinary team of geneticists and engineers, say that in addition to physical methods of monitoring CCS sites, such as measuring CO2 levels, which currently lack clear protocols and can be difficult at remote sites, it should be possible to monitor the bacteria and archaea living in sediment overlying these sites to detect potential leaks. They point to a simulated CO2 leak experiment previously conducted in a sub-seabed reservoir off the west coast of Scotland that detected changes in the microbial communities around the reservoir, before other organisms were visibly affected.
The researchers note that this approach will require more information on microbial communities and how they respond to fluctuations in CO2. It will also depend on the development of tools to sequence and analyze the genomic and metagenomics data in microbial communities, relate it to environmental conditions, and allow for the detection of small-scale changes in microbial response, such as a CO2 leak.
A trade-off between risks and necessity
While there is a lot of work to be done to turn this microbial monitoring and utilization of CO2 storage sites into a reality, the researchers believe it will be worth it. As Kjetill S. Jakobsen (@kjetillj) of the University of Oslo says, “There is a trade-off between risks and the necessity to control and to mediate CO2 and if you really have a huge problem like ocean acidification, you might have to use these techniques to get rid of it.”
Funding was provided by the COVERALL project, the Research Council of Norway, and the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.
Natalie Hicks: Natalie.Hicks@sams.ac.uk, +44 (0) 1631 559 440 (office)
Kjetill S Jakobsen, firstname.lastname@example.org, +47-22854602 (office)/+47-90741779
Unni Vik: email@example.com, +47-22854588
Trends in Biotechnology, Hicks et al.: “Using prokaryotes for Carbon Capture Storage”
Trends in Biotechnology (@TrendsinBiotech), published by Cell Press, is a monthly review journal of applied biosciences. It addresses what is new, significant, and practicable in the integrated use of many biological technologies--from molecular genetics to biochemical engineering. Visit: http://www.cell.com/trends/biotechnology. To receive Cell Press media alerts, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Mest lest siste syv dager
Nyheter fra andre
Nye beregninger viser at fuglearter dør ut fem ganger fortere enn før antatt og ca. 1000 ganger fortere enn de ville gjort uten menneskelig påvirkning. Den gode nyheten er at vernetiltak faktisk virker – så godt at utryddelseshastigheten blir redusert med hele 40 prosent.
Improved calculations reveal that bird species go extinct five times faster than previously thought, and about 1000 times faster than in the absence of human activity. The good news is that conservation helps – it has reduced the rate of extinction by as much as 40 percent.
Når forskarane skal undersøkja kva råd kundane får på apoteket, får dei best resultat når dei tilsette ikkje veit kven dei er. Men dei må vera merksame på dei etiske omsyna.
“Academics should stop worrying too much about indices", says Professor Colin Chapman from the George Washington University. Professor Nils Chr. Stenseth at the University of Oslo agrees: "The scientific journals' obsessive use of indices is damaging the quality of science", he says.