When a species is no longer a single species

Innocent malaria mosquito? The females bite. But not all individuals belonging to the insect species Anopheles gambiae are able to transmit malaria to humans, according to recent discoveries. Foto: Public Domain Images

When a species is no longer a single species

How can we decipher the secret of cryptic species?

How do you define a species? To non-biologists this might sound like the most basic and most obvious of all questions. Yet, there are few matters that stir up more intense discussions between scientists.

On the 13th of June, the question was illuminated and debated by some of the world’s leading experts at the Natural History Museum (NHM) of the University of Oslo, hosting an international symposium on the topic of cryptic species.

– In theory, the capacity to reproduce is the hallmark to define species. However, the established practice is to define a species based on morphology. Individuals belong to the same species if they have very similar appearance,” explains Torsten Struck at NHM.

Recently, due to the increased usage of DNA-based methods, biologists were able to identify a number of species within traditionally established species. In some of these cases, difference in appearance could be detected. In other cases, several new species did not carry any visible differences in their characteristics.

: Torstein H Struck i grønn skjorte, Dimitar Dimitrov i hvit og José Cerca de Oliveira i blå skjorte
Scientists interested in cryptic species. From left: José Cerca de Oliveira, Torstein H. Struck and Dimitar Dimitrov. Photo: NHM.

Indeed, they look very similar or even identical to the human eye, even to the eyes of a trained expert. Such complexes of species are known as cryptic species.

The topic of cryptic species challenges much of the conventional wisdom forming the basis of established taxonomies and the traditional practices of biological classification.

Why are cryptic species important?

Cryptic species harbour an unexpected high genetic diversity. The lack of morphological change is traditionally regarded as morphological stasis.

Since there has been no detectable change in appearance, it has been argued that the individuals of these different species could interbreed with each other and therefore very limited genetic diversity was expected.

Although cryptic species are detected at an increasing pace, several questions still need to be addressed:

  • Why do cryptic species occur at this high degree?
  • Is this phenomenon common throughout the tree of life; in plants, fungi, worms, insects, birds, mammals?
  • Does it occur more often in certain environments, such as the sea?
  • Is there a common process explaining the phenomenon?

Recent research points out that, despite strong morphological similarities among closely related cryptic species, there might be differences in habitat preferences, chemical communications or feeding specializations that set them apart.

Malaria mosquitoes that cannot transmit malaria

Recognizing distinct species is important for many applied fields of science, such as conservation biology and epidemiology. For example, the insect species Anopheles gambiae is responsible for the transmission of malaria to humans. Recently, this species was recognised as a cryptic species complex.

Other news articles in english from

Interestingly, not all species belonging to this complex are able to transmit malaria. After the cryptic species were recognized, it was shown that they exhibit differences in habitat preferences – different species prefer different types of water ponds.

In this case, correct identification is vital for defining measures and common practices to avoid malaria transmission by mosquitoes.

What are the future implications?

The purpose of the conference at the Natural History Museum in Oslo was to discuss the processes and implications around the research associated with cryptic species. Approximately 50 researchers gathered at Tøyen Hovedgård manor house in the Botanical garden.

: Torstein H Struck i grønn skjorte, Dimitar Dimitrov i hvit og José Cerca de Oliveira i blå skjorte
Dimitar Dimitrov, José Cerca de Oliveira and Torstein H. Struck discussing new knowledge about the development of cryptic species. Foto: NHM.

After an introductory talk by Professor Torsten Struck (NHM, UiO), three keynote speakers gave their contributions: Professor Jeffrey Feder (University of Notre Dame, USA), Professor Gene Hunt (National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, USA) and Professor Sarah Samadi (Muséum National D’Histoire Naturelle, Paris).

Discussions showed that a cryptic species complex will cause the evolution of cryptic species in their parasites.

Another find is that the detection of cryptic species is related to the established taxonomic practices of a researcher. The less inclined a researcher is to describe a new species on minute differences, the higher is the degree of cryptic species. Hence, the degree of detecting cryptic species also depends on the human observer bias.

These public lectures were followed by further discussions about concepts and consequences related to cryptic species and the associated research. Following this symposium, the scientists from the Natural History Museum will write a scientific paper that will discuss the issues of cryptic species and pave the road for future works on this topic.

Also on

Røff sex i Andeby

Pointless to clone a pretty cat

Other news articles in english

For more information:

Torsten H. Struck – Professor of Evolutionary Genomics

Dimitar Dimitrov – Independent PostDoctoral fellow

José Cerca de Oliveira –Ph.D. student                                   


Les også

Kan mors medisiner passere over til barnet via brystmelken?

European mega-venture for safe medications during pregnancy

“It takes an estimated 27 years to determine if a novel medication can be used by pregnant women without risking adverse effects on the fetus or child. This just can’t continue any longer”, says Professor Hedvig Nordeng at the University of Oslo’s Department of Pharmacy.

Bakterier som Yersinia enterocoloitica bruker klebrige utvekster for å feste seg til et underlag

A novel antibiotic idea: Preventing bacterial stickiness

Antibiotics most commonly work by killing bacteria, for example by destroying their cell wall or by interfering with protein synthesis. Now researchers at UiO are launching a completely new idea: They want to prevent bacteria from sticking to a substrate, before an infection can even occur.